Norman v. State

JOSEPH NORMAN, JR. v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Appeals, Watts, March 27, 2017,
Car Stop- Odor of Marijuana- Without more, an odor of marijuana coming from a vehicle does not allow police to frisk the occupants

Plurality
(Main opinion- Watts with Hotten)
(Join in judgment only- Greene)
(Concur- Adkins with Barbera- not reasonable to believe passenger involved in drug dealing where car smells of mj)
(Dissent- Getty with McDonald – probable cause for drugs should be RAS to frisk)
Continue reading

Robinson v. State

JERMAUL RONDELL ROBINSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND
DEXTER WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
VERNON HARVEY SPRIGGS, III v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Court of Appeals, Watts, Jan. 20, 2017,
Search – Police have probable cause to search a vehicle where they detect an odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle

Following the CoSA opinion in Bowling
Continue reading

Deon Williams v. State

DEON LEROY WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Alpert, Filed Dec. 2, 2016,
Strip Search – Strip search was lawful when conducted in police barracks incident to arrest for traffic violation given nervousness, large quantity of cash, and reliable informant information that the Defendant was in possession of drugs

Continue reading

Sellman v. State

DONZEL SELLMAN v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Appeals, Greene, August 24, 2016,
Frisk – Nervousness, presence in a high crime area, conflicting stories, and questionable identity provided did not amount to reasonable suspicion that the suspect was armed and dangerous. Frisk was illegal.

(Dissent – Watts, joined by Battaglia – would find RAS for frisk based on totality of circumstances, would credit arresting officer as did fact finder)
Continue reading

Utah v. Strieff

UTAH v. EDWARD JOSEPH STRIEFF, JR.
Supreme Court of the United States, Thomas, June 20, 2016,
Search – Exclusionary Rule – Evidence recovered from a suspect search incident to a valid arrest warrant need not be excluded even where the initial detention lacked reasonable suspicion

(Dissent – Sotomayor joined by Ginsburg for parts I-III – Starts by misstating the Court’s holding, then provides legitimate points related to a constitutional violation providing the basis for a constitutional search, then on her own discusses racial impact of unconstitutional policing)
(Dissent – Kagan with Ginsburg – Discovery of an arrest warrant after an unconstitutional stop is not an “intervening circumstance,” it is a product of the unconstitutional stop)
Continue reading

US v. Lull

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZACKARY ROBERT LULL
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Duncan, May 25, 2016,
Search Warrant – Omission of information regarding informant reliability (informant tried to steal buy money and misled investigators) was sufficient to satisfy the “intentionality” and “materiality” prongs of Franks

(Concur & Dissent – Davis – The omission was “reckless,” but even if included “no judge with experience issuing warrants would have refused to issue the search warrant in this case.”)
Continue reading

United States v. Palmer

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL JEROME PALMER
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, King, Filed April 21, 2016,
Search – Vehicle – Where RAS existed to suspect that a VA-required inspection-sticker mounted on the windshield was fraudulent, officer’s entry into the vehicle for purpose of examining the sticker was reasonable and did not constitute an unconstitutional search.

(Concur by Wynn – Taking time to run criminal background check was called for in this case, but is not part of a standard traffic stop)
Continue reading

Bowling v. State

JOSHUA PAUL BOWLING v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Graeff, Filed March 31, 2016,
CDS – Odor of Marijuana provides probable cause to believe evidence of “contraband or crime” is located within vehicle, thus justifying warrantless search without regard to quantity

Followed by CoA
Continue reading