US v. Marvin Powell

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARVIN WILBERT POWELL
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Niemeyer, March 1, 2017,
Ineffective Assistance- A defense attorney was not required to seek to disqualify a juror where she told the defendant’s father that “everything would be alright and that [he] needed to give [his] son a good kick in the butt.”

Continue reading

Spencer v. State

KEVON SPENCER v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Appeals, Greene, Nov. 29, 2016,
Attempt- Where defendant veered off of the road to get around police vehicles and struck a pedestrian, insufficient evidence to convict of attempted murder

(Plurality opinion as to Batson, with Watts concurring. Majority opinion formed for the Insufficient Evidence portion by adding Barbera)
(Dissent in part- Barbera – Disagrees on Batson, but agrees insufficient evidence to convict of attempted murder. Essentially quotes that portion of the CoSA opinion.)
(Dissent and Concur- Watts- Agrees on Batson, but disagrees that there was insufficient evidence to convict)
(Dissent- McDonald – Disagrees on Batson, disagrees on insufficiency of evidence – and we should get rid of peremptory challenges)
(Dissent- Getty- Disagrees on Batson, disagrees on insufficiency of evidence)
Continue reading

Foster v. Chatman

TIMOTHY TYRONE FOSTER, PETITIONER v. BRUCE CHATMAN, WARDEN
Supreme Court of the United States, Roberts, May 23, 2016,
Batson – 1987 murder conviction overturned where State provided “implausible” and “fantastic” assertions in response to defense evidence that jurors were removed on basis of race

(Concur – Alito – Yes, there was a violation, but the State should decide whether it is barred by res judicata)
(Dissent – Thomas – This claim was already considered and rejected at the State level; wrong of the court to fact-find)
Continue reading

Ray-Simmons v State

MASHEA LOUISE RAY-SIMMONS A/K/A TAYANA SIMMONS AND ANTIONETTE MCGOULDRICK v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Appeals, Barbera, Filed Feb. 22, 2016,
Jury Selection – Prosecutor’s explanation facing Batson challenge that “I intended to replace [a struck juror] with another black male” is not race-neutral and not “clear and reasonably specific” as to the basis for the strike

(Dissent- McDonald – We should get rid of peremptory challenges altogether. Prosecutor’s explanation related to stage 1 (pattern), not stage 2 (explanation). Also, objection was waived.)
Continue reading

Brice v. State

JOVAN MAURICE BRICE v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Woodward, Filed Nov. 25, 2015,
Prohibited Person – Regulated Firearms – “There is no language in [PS 5-144(a)(1)] requiring a defendant to know that he is disqualified.”

(ed note – Bad legal analysis, so careful leaning too hard on this one)
Continue reading