Kolbe v. Hogan

STEPHEN V. KOLBE et al. v. LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Jr.
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (En Banc), King, Feb. 21, 2017,
Second Amendment- Assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment

Overturning the panel opinion reviewed here

(Full join- King with Gregory, Wilkinson, Motz, Keenan, Wynn, Floyd, Thacker, and Harris)
(Join in part on 2A, Join on 14A- Diaz)(Concur in part, concur in 2A judgment, join 14A- Diaz – Would say that intermediate scrutiny was satisfied, no need to address whether 2A applies to assault weapons)
(Join in 14A- Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee)
(Concur- Wilkinson with Wynn – Legislators should decide what weapons are “common”)
(Dissent on 2A- Traxler with Niemeyer, Shedd, and Agee – the 2nd Amendment applies to assault weapons and strict scrutiny should be applied)
(Dissent on 14A, Concur in judgment- Traxler- Retired LEO are in the same class as those seeking assault rifles, agree “copycat” is not vague)
Continue reading

Voisine v. United States

STEPHEN L. VOISINE AND WILLIAM E. ARMSTRONG, III, PETITIONERS v. UNITED STATES
Supreme Court of the United States, Kagan, June 27, 2016,
Firearm Possession – 18 USC 922(g)(9) – A charge based on the reckless form of domestic assault can trigger the ban for those convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.”

(Dissent – Thomas with Sotomayor in part – “using force” suggests a level of intent not found in recklessness)

Continue reading

Kolbe v. Hogan

STEPHEN V. KOLBE v. LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR.
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Traxler, Filed Feb. 4, 2016,
Second Amendment – Firearms – Strict Scrutiny is the proper standard by which to measure firearm restrictions that implicate the “core” of the Second Amendment within the home
Vacated by en banc opinion
Continue reading